Guidance you can check, for a search that takes longer than anyone tells you
Jobseeker Digest covers three things properly rather than everything badly: the documents you send, the conversations you have, and the administration of running a search over several months. Every article names the board member who reviewed it.
Resumes and cover letters
Formatting that survives an applicant tracking system, and how to describe a gap without apologising for it.
Interviews
Panels, the compensation question under provincial pay-transparency rules, and what to do with a bad answer you have already given.
Running the search
Tracking applications, reference checks, and deciding when a posting is not a real vacancy.
Recently published
-
The compensation question, now that postings carry a range
Pay transparency requirements have changed what the question means. It is no longer a bluffing exercise in most of the country.
11 Aug 2026
-
Reference checks: what a former employer in Canada can actually say
Most of the folklore here is imported from elsewhere. What limits a reference is defamation and privacy law, plus company policy.
23 Jun 2026
-
Employment gaps, described plainly
A gap is a fact about a calendar. The failure mode is the explanation, not the gap.
07 May 2026
-
Panel interviews: who is actually deciding
A panel is rarely five equal votes. Working out the shape of the room changes what you should be doing in it.
19 Mar 2026
-
Formatting a resume that a tracking system can read
Six things that reliably break parsing, and the much longer list of things that do not matter.
04 Feb 2026
How this site is funded
Jobseeker Digest carries no advertising and takes no fee from recruiters, employers or resume services. Our editorial board is named, with each member’s current employment disclosed, so you can judge the conflicts yourself rather than trusting a statement that there are none.